ShareThis Page
Marsalis’ outspokenness stirs mixed feelings among colleagues |

Marsalis’ outspokenness stirs mixed feelings among colleagues

Bob Karlovits
| Sunday, May 2, 2004 12:00 a.m

One of the most popular jazz artists of this era, Wynton Marsalis also is one of the most controversial.

“I think his promulgation of an orthodoxy whereby jazz ‘must’ do this, that or the other is ridiculous and has caused a lot of needless division,” says bassist Lindsey Horner, who lived in Pittsburgh before moving his career back to New York City.

“He has tried to define the parameters of jazz, and when you can so clearly define an art form, it is dying,” says Ken Vandermark, an avant-garde sax player who operates out of the adventurous music scene in Chicago.

“I find Wynton’s idea of what jazz is, should be, and can be, far too limiting,” says saxophonist Ben Opie, leader of Pittsburgh’s innovative 12-piece OPEK band.

But Marsalis, the creator of hot-selling albums and award-winning compositions, also has his supporters.

“He is blazing some serious trails,” says Bill McFarlin, executive director of the International Association of Jazz Educators, based in Kansas. “People are creative in different ways, and there is a huge spectrum to his work.”

“He has done a lot for jazz when it needed it desperately,” says Peter Levinson, a Californian who has written several music biographies and worked for many years in music promotion.

“He got rid of the old image of a jazz man as a guy starving, on drugs and living in New York City,” says Nathan Davis, director of jazz studies at the University of Pittsburgh.

Marsalis has generated a world of opinion with his dedication to the tradition of jazz. While many listeners understand and agree with his unfaltering focus on the roles of Louis Armstrong, Duke Ellington, Thelonious Monk and the like, an equal number get irate at his apparent lack of willingness to examine newer forms.

In conversations over the past 20 years, Marsalis has never focused on that criticism or altered his views. In fact, at times, he has seemed perplexed at being criticized for having an opinion.

Those who disagree with him take on the attitude of doubters more than detractors. Horner attended the Juilliard School of Music at the same time Marsalis did, so is quite familiar with the remarkable talent that has won Marsalis awards for classical performance as well as jazz.

“Technically, he is one of the great trumpet players,” Vandermark says.

But they also challenge him for seeming to establish the limits of “true jazz” somewhere in the ’60s, a time before the explorations of Albert Ayler or Cecil Taylor. That also eliminates any value to contemporary jazz, says Vandermark, leader of his own quintet and participant in many other forward-looking projects.

In trying to “intellectualize” the music, Marsalis has created a sound that is “very, very dry.” The trumpeter denies the importance of an “individual voice in the musical collective,” Vandermark says.

Horner agrees and says that leads to albums that are “pleasant enough,” but ones he doesn’t listen to with the frequency of trumpeter Dave Douglas, who has done fresh interpretations of standards as well as playing in an ethno-improv band.

Opie and Horner, in separate interviews, both say Marsalis is less of an “innovator” than many other jazz performers and, hence, is not taking the music anyplace new.

Marsalis’ supporters are quick to point out his winning of the Pulitzer Prize as well as several Grammy awards as an indication of the worth of his music. Michael Cuscuna, a producer of many famous jazz recordings, also points out Marsalis has done quite a bit of fresh work as artistic director of the Jazz at Lincoln Center in New York City.

Marsalis has presented such artists there as Ornette Coleman, Andrew Hill and Geri Allen, Cuscuna says, “not artists he would agree with but those he sees as important.”

“He is hugely opinionated, but not close-minded,” Cuscuna says. “Most of us just edit ourselves more.”

The Lincoln Center program will be moving into a new $128 million home in the fall, and Cuscuna says Marsalis’ work leading it has been “extraordinary.”

McFarlin says Marsalis deserves great credit to undertaking “massive” work at Lincoln Center that has “pushed the envelope educationally as well as musically.”

Pitt’s Davis agrees Marsalis’ music tends to be conservative, but points out he has heard him go many different directions, from New Orleans-based tunes to bebop.

“If you’re a good trumpet player, you can do it all,” he says. “He has brought some of the older music back to the forefront and people should be able to hear that, too.”

Mike Tomaro, director of jazz studies at Duquesne University, Uptown, says he is sometimes upset that Marsalis “has been proclaimed as the absolute authority on jazz.”

But he suspects much of that is related to the media and fans getting caught up in a successful marketing campaign by record companies,

“One fact that cannot be denied is that he is a phenomenal trumpet player,” Tomaro says.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.