ShareThis Page
Masloff in hospital, reported as ‘alert’ |

Masloff in hospital, reported as ‘alert’

| Sunday, February 13, 2011 12:00 a.m

Former Pittsburgh Mayor Sophie Masloff, who once thought a caller claiming to be Bill Clinton was a prankster and hung up on him, is recuperating from pneumonia in UPMC Shadyside.

“She was alert and lectured me about politics, which I took to be a good sign,” her attorney, Frederick N. Frank, said Saturday.

Masloff, 93, hadn’t been feeling well for a few days and was admitted to the hospital Friday night after calling 9-1-1.

In 1992, when he was running for president, Clinton called the Pittsburgh mayor’s office and introduced himself. Masloff, thinking a prankster was on the line, said: “Yeah, and this is the Queen of Sheba,” and hung up.

The colorful Masloff became known as Pittsburgh’s grandmother after breaking through political barriers to become the first woman and first Jewish person to serve as mayor.

Then 70 and a grandmother, she became mayor when Mayor Richard Caliguiri died in May 1988. It was Masloff’s personal brand of politics, however, that propelled her career, longtime friends and associates say.

During a political debate when she was running for a full term as mayor in 1989, one of her opponents criticized negative campaigning, presumably in reference to Masloff.

“That’s like being called ugly by a frog,” she said.

Some political observers said the comment might have sealed her victory.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.