ShareThis Page
Matchups – Pitt vs. Kent State |

Matchups – Pitt vs. Kent State

| Thursday, March 21, 2002 12:00 a.m

PITT (29-5) vs. KENT STATE (29-5)

Point guard

  • The showdown: 6-3 Brandin Knight (Pitt) vs. 6-1 Trevor Huffman (Kent State)

  • The breakdown: A matchup of two highly skilled players. Knight, a third-team All-American, has carried Pitt to a No. 9 ranking and its first Sweet 16 appearance since 1974. Huffman doesn’t get the recognition he deserves, playing in the obscure Mid-American Conference.

  • The edge: Pitt

    Shooting guard

  • The showdown: 6-3 Julius Page (Pitt) vs. 5-11 Andrew Mitchell (Kent State)

  • The breakdown: Page, Pitt’s top defender, is a capable scorer, but his primary duty will be to shut down the aformentioned Huffman. Mitchell, with a scoring average of 15.2 ppg., gives Kent State another offensive threat in the backcourt. Knight will be assigned to Mitchell.

  • The edge: Pitt

    Small forward

  • The showdown: 6-4 Jaron Brown (Pitt) vs. 6-3 Demetric Shaw (Kent State)

  • The breakdown: Though Shaw is listed as a guard, he’ll have to face a powerful forward in Brown. The Pitt sophomore leads the Panthers in rebounding (6.1) while Shaw is a versatile swingman who is second on the team in assists (5.4).

  • The edge: Pitt

    Power forward

  • The showdown: 6-8 Donatas Zavackas (Pitt) vs. 6-5 Antonio Gates (Kent State)

  • The breakdown: The 240-pound Gates, who originally signed with Michigan State to play football, could cause a major matchup problem for Pitt. His strength and leaping ability make him a formidable scorer (15.6 ppg.) and tenacious rebounder (8.1).

  • The edge: Kent State


  • The showdown: 6-7 Chevon Troutman (Pitt) vs. 6-9 Nate Gerwig (Kent State)

  • The breakdown: A matchup of Pennsylvania natives, Troutman, of Williamsport, has come on in the second half of the season and moved into the starting lineup for Pitt in the second round of the NCAAs. Kent State is 23-1 since Gerwig, of Schenley High, became a starter.

  • The edge: Pitt


  • The showdown: Ben Howland (Pitt) vs. Stan Heath (Kent State)

  • The breakdown: Howland has been recognized as the best coach in the nation. He earned the Naismith and USBWA awards this week. Heath, in his first season at Kent State, has led the Golden Flashes to victories over two higher-seeded teams in the NCAA tournament.

  • The edge: Pitt

    Categories: News
  • TribLIVE commenting policy

    You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

    We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

    While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

    We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

    We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

    We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

    We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

    We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.