ShareThis Page
Mayor: Pittsburgh officer acquitted of assault won’t be rehired |

Mayor: Pittsburgh officer acquitted of assault won’t be rehired

| Thursday, April 22, 2010 12:00 p.m

Pittsburgh Mayor Luke Ravenstahl said yesterday that he won’t rehire a police sergeant he fired because of domestic violence accusations unless an independent arbitrator forces him to do it.

An Allegheny County judge this week acquitted former Sgt. Eugene Hlavac on one count of simple assault, based on witness testimony that Hlavac was defending himself when he struck ex-girlfriend Lauren Maughan in the face during an argument Dec. 18.

“Hlavac should not be working with the city, and we will continue to take that course of action,” said Joanna Doven, Ravenstahl’s spokeswoman.

Police officials fired Hlavac, 43, in January after Maughan said he partially dislocated her jaw when he slapped her in front of their 3-year-old child, Austin.

After Common Pleas Judge Tom Flaherty announced his verdict, Hlavac said he would try to get his job back. He was on the police force for 18 years. He was paid $64,000 a year.

Phillip DiLucente, Hlavac’s attorney, criticized the mayor’s handling of the case and said his client will fight for his job.

“I think this is a political hot potato,” DiLucente said. “I truly believe in my heart that this administration does not know how to deal with the policy of domestic allegations, not domestic abuse. They don’t know how to deal with domestic allegations so that they’re not infringing on a person’s employment rights.”

The matter of Hlavac’s job likely will go before an independent arbitrator who would rule whether the city should reinstate Hlavac and whether he deserves back pay.

No date for an arbitration hearing is set.

Police Chief Nate Harper said he stands by his decision to fire Hlavac for violating the department’s anti-domestic violence policy. The firing was not based on the crime with which Hlavac was charged, said police spokeswoman Diane Richard.

Dan O’Hara, president of Fraternal Order of Police Fort Pitt Lodge No. 1, said he expects Hlavac to be reinstated with back pay. Based on his annual salary, Hlavac has not received 14 weeks of pay, or about $18,000.

“He’s going to win because he did not get convicted of a criminal defense and there is no reason to fire him,” O’Hara said. “It’s going to be more wasted tax dollars when the arbitrator rules in his favor.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.