ShareThis Page
Mayor to consider run as Republican |

Mayor to consider run as Republican

Wynne Everett
| Wednesday, May 16, 2001 12:00 a.m

TARENTUM: Tarentum’s mayor of 24 years was likely unseated Tuesday by fewer than 20 votes.

Mayor James Wolfe was edged out in the Democratic primary by Councilman Chuck Behanna.

Since no Republicans are on the ballot for mayor, nomination likely means victory for Behanna in November. However, Wolfe said he is weighing a run on the GOP ticket in the fall.

‘I got enough write-in votes as a Republican to win that nomination,’ Wolfe said. ‘So I’m considering it.’

Wolfe said he wasn’t disappointed for himself so much as his supporters, particularly his family.

‘I guess there has to be a winner and there has to be a loser,’ he said. ‘My daughter worked so hard on this thing. I feel bad for her.’

Behanna said he was ecstatic to have won and thanked voters for their support. If Wolfe chooses to run as a Republican, Behanna said he will take on the challenge of another race in the fall.

Meanwhile, he said he would begin planning his agenda.

‘My issues are really Tarentum’s issues and what I’d like to focus on first is bringing the community together and getting rid of the friction,’ he said.

Priorities will include economic development and inclusion of the community in local politics, he said.

‘We have a lot to do here in Tarentum and it’s not going to happen overnight, but we’re going to get right to work on it,’ he said.

Behanna lauded Wolfe for his years of service to Tarentum.

‘I respect Mr. Wolfe,’ Behanna said Tuesday. ‘The guy’s been in office for so many years. I commend him for his experience. I commend him for what he’s done.’

Wynne Everett can be reached at

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.