McCandless mum on probe into alleged misconduct by two cops put on paid leave |

McCandless mum on probe into alleged misconduct by two cops put on paid leave

Tony LaRussa

It’s been two weeks since McCandless officials announced that two members of the police department have been placed on paid administrative leave while an investigation is being conducted.

But town officials on Tuesday declined requests to release the names of the officers who are under investigation or the nature of the allegations against them.

“The town cannot provide any further details at this time due to the confidential nature of the investigation,” said Gavin Robb, the town’s attorney in an email Tuesday.

Councilman Greg Walkauskus said by telephone that council discussed the investigation during a lengthy executive session held before Monday night’s council meeting but that he could not provide any additional information about what was discussed.

“Someone at the meeting asked that we (council) enlighten them about what was going on, but this is a personnel matter that we are not at liberty to talk about publicly,” he said.

The town first announced that the officers were on paid leave in an Oct. 29 posting on social media.

Town officials also have declined to answer questions about who is heading the police department after news reports were published indicating that the chief, David DiSantis, was one of the people placed on leave.

DiSantis, who was hired in August 2016 to replace retiring chief Gary Anderson, did not attend Monday’s council meeting to give the chief’s report.

The report was instead delivered by Lt. Don O’Connor.

DiSantis could not be reached for comment.

Councilman Steve Mertz on Tuesday said the investigation, which is expected to be concluded by Nov. 21, is not being led by the town’s solicitor, but rather an attorney with experience in personnel matters.

“We’re (council) expecting to get a report about the matter at that time,” Mertz said.

Mertz reiterated comments he posted on social media that officials “are not hiding anything” from the public.

“As with all personnel matters, there are legal issues pertaining to discussion of any details until we know all of the information,” he wrote.” Until then, I assure you that all steps are being taken to be as fair as possible to all parties involved.”

Councilman Bill Kirk said the officers were placed on leave to protect the people involved.

“As previously reported, this is an internal personnel matter and so by its very nature is confidential,” Kirk wrote in an email. “Typically, paid administrative leave is used out of an abundance of caution to protect all parties involved during an internal review and is not a disciplinary action.”

Tony LaRussa is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tony at 724-772-6368 or [email protected] or via Twitter @TonyLaRussaTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.