ShareThis Page
McClendon, Pirates don’t buy into humidor theory |

McClendon, Pirates don’t buy into humidor theory

Joe Rutter
| Saturday, August 9, 2003 12:00 a.m

DENVER — Coors Field remains one of the most hitter-friendly ballparks in the major leagues. But as far as being baseball’s runaway leader in runs scored, that’s no longer the case.

This year, it’s close, but no cigar.

Blame it on the humidor.

Scoring has decreased since the beginning of the 2002 season when the Colorado Rockies began storing their baseballs in a humidor. The climate-controlled chamber was introduced in an attempt to get rid of the beer-league softball game scores that were prevalent here.

So far, it appears to be working.

Coors Field, which is in its ninth season, ranks third among major-league facilities in runs scored, trailing The Ballpark at Arlington and SkyDome. Until the humidor was installed, Coors Field always was the No. 1 place to score runs in the majors.

Still, skeptics remain. Even though the Pirates were shut out twice and held to two runs and eighth hits in a three-game series last year, manager Lloyd McClendon refuses to give the humidor any credit. Ditto for third baseman Jose Hernandez, who spent the first two and a half months this season playing for the Rockies.

“A humidor is made for cigars and not baseballs,” Hernandez said. “I don’t think it does anything to a baseball. It’s the same old Coors to me.”

Scientists and numbers crunchers would beg to differ. Scoring and home runs have declined here since 2001, the year before the humidor was installed. An average of 13.4 runs was scored per game in 2001, with the number dropping to 12.21 last year and 11.86 so far this season. Homers declined from 3.31 a game to 2.86 last year to 2.77 this season.

The Rockies decided to build a humidor when studies revealed that the thin Rocky Mountain air was making baseball’s tighter, harder and slicker. The role of the humidor was to keep the composition of the ball intact.

The problem was, the Rockies built the chamber before receiving official approval from Major League Baseball. It was a few days after the Pirates visited here last May that the Denver Post broke the story about the humidor.

“I still don’t know what the rules are about it,” McClendon said Friday. “To this day, I don’t know what the league stance is on it. I still don’t know what the Commissioner’s Office ever said about it.”

Baseball eventually approved the Rockies’ use of the humidor, but the debate about it’s impact on a baseball continues.

“People talk about it, but it’s no big deal,” Hernandez said. “You’ve still got to hit the ball. If you hit the ball good, it’s still going to carry a long way here. That hasn’t changed.”

Sixteen months later, the Pirates returned to the thin air to begin another series with the Rockies, but McClendon still wasn’t buying into the Humidor Hullabaloo.

“We weren’t hitting when we were here the last time,” he said. “It’s not like we were killing the ball and driving it to the warning track and coming up short. We weren’t making contact. You’ve got to hit the ball to see whether it’s dead or not.”

McClendon pointed out that Rockies scored 23 runs during that series sweep.

“They had to hit the same balls,” he said.

And it’s not like the Pirates had much success here pre-humidor, either. Taking into account the two previous games played here and the Pirates were batting .167 at Coors.

Still, what transpired here last season bordered on the surreal. The Pirates were shut out for the first time in Coors history on April 30. One night later, they became the first team ever to be shut out in back-to-back games here. They were held hitless over 12 full innings before Armando Rios singled with one out in the seventh inning May 2.

In 27 innings, the Pirates recorded eight hits, only one of which went for extra bases.

“It was kind of embarrassing,” shortstop Jack Wilson said. “But we’ve got a chance to turn it around this time.”

That matchup doesn’t appear to favor the Pirates.

Consider that the Pirates’ 12-23 record and .343 winning percentage is tied for the second worst in Coors Field history. Only the Milwaukee Brewers, with a 6-18 record and .250 winning percentage, have fared worse since the ballpark opened in 1995.

The Rockies, on the other hand, have a 40-17 home record that is tops in the major leagues. Scoring may be down, but the Rockies are finding a way to win.

McClendon thinks he knows the reason, and it has nothing to do with a humidor.

“Maybe,” McClendon said, “pitching has something to do with it.”

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review steelers reporter. You can contact Joe via Twitter .

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.