ShareThis Page
McCook Mansion harbors history |

McCook Mansion harbors history

Historic preservation is the reason Richard Pearson is moving ahead with a $5.5 million bed-and-breakfast development in Shadyside.

He, his family and a group of local investors have formed a company to restore the McCook Mansion on Fifth Avenue and an adjoining building on Amberson Avenue, which was damaged by fire, instead of demolishing them and building a 20-unit condominium on the site.

“We believe in protecting our (historic) treasures,” he said. “We are currently securing financing and designing the renovation, with hopes that we could open late in the fall of 2007.”

The McCook Mansion was built in 1906 as part of what was known along Fifth Avenue as Millionaire Row. Only a few of the original buildings remain.

His building is one of 130 “historic” sites and 15 neighborhoods within Pittsburgh that the Young Preservationists Association of Pittsburgh yesterday reported are not protected by the city’s landmarks ordinance.

The report, titled “Unprotected Pittsburgh: Preservation Priorities and Resources for Preserving Pittsburgh’s Historic Landmarks,” also lists a number of programs and organizations that can help property owners preserve historic properties, said Dan Holland, association founder and board chairman.

The next step to obtain historic designation for any of the 130 sites or 15 neighborhoods is to submit an application to the city, he said.

“It would be best that both the property owner and the individual or group making the nomination agree on the action, but the application can be filed without the owner’s permission,” he said.

Once an application has been submitted to the city planning commission, both the commission and the city’s Historic Review Commission must hold public hearings on the request, to determine if it meets one of 10 criteria set by the city ordinance. And before it can receive the designation, city council must conduct a public hearing.

Holland supports passage of Senate Bill 1232 — the $10 million Historic Preservation Incentive Grant Program — currently in the Senate’s Appropriations Committee, which would provide grants of up to $15,000 for residential properties and up to $500,000 for commercial buildings.

Sen. Jim Ferlo, D-Highland Park, one of the co-sponsors of the bill, said he is hopeful the measure can be approved before year’s end.

“The leading Republican in the Senate, Sen. Jeff Picolla, R-Dauphin County, has co-sponsored the bill, and we have received bipartisan support for it,” he said.

Of the 130 sites listed, Downtown has the most unprotected historic sites at 24 with the Hill District second at 23. Shadyside has 10, Oakland has eight and Lawrenceville has seven.

Holland said African-American history tops the list with 37 unprotected historic sites. Among them are the August Wilson birthplace and home, Crawford Grill No. 2, both in the Hill District; the first home of the National Negro Opera Co. and the home of Robert L. Vann, founder of the Pittsburgh Courier, both in Homewood.

Other sites listed included B’Nai Israel Synagogue in East Liberty, Kaufmann’s Department Store (now Macy’s), Downtown, and the Duquesne Incline, Mt. Washington, where the news conference was held.

Among the 15 historic districts are Woodland Road National Register Historic District in Squirrel Hill, Chatham Village in Mt. Washington and East Liberty Town Square.

The report is available by clicking here.

Additional Information:

Complete coverage

var site=’PAGRE’ var section=’US’

    Pennsylvania Stories
var site=’PAGRE’var section=’US’ Section Fronts
News | World
Politics | Storms
Iraq | Bird Flu
NFL Team-by-Team
NFL Game Stories

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.