ShareThis Page
McKeesport man indicted in large fraud conspiracy |

McKeesport man indicted in large fraud conspiracy

| Thursday, August 20, 2015 12:20 p.m.

A McKeesport man and others stole the identity of a local company in 2010 and used that information to steal electronics from three other companies, federal prosecutors say.

A federal grand jury on Aug. 11 indicted Daniel K. Miller, 52, on fraud charges, conspiracy to commit money laundering and related counts.

Miller’s attorney, Alexander Lindsay, declined comment.

According to the indictment, the suspects obtained the banking and credit information of a local business, identified as “Victim 1,” that frequently buys goods from vendors nationwide.

Using the stolen information, the suspects set up a website and email account that appeared to belong to Victim 1 and started contacting vendors to place orders.

Between Sept. 1 and Sept. 14 of 2010 they ordered 600 external hard drives, 13 projectors and 450 2-gigabyte computer memory chips from three other companies.

Some of the merchandise was shipped to addresses in Memphis and Talladega, Ala., where it was reshipped overseas. The rest was shipped to an address Miller controlled in McKeesport and reshipped overseas.

When Miller had trouble reshipping 400 external hard drives, he started selling them on Craigslist and wired the proceeds to a conspirator in Nigeria, prosecutors say.

Brian Bowling is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-325-4301 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.