ShareThis Page
Medical technology firm files for bankruptcy |

Medical technology firm files for bankruptcy

Cardiac Telecom Corp., a medical technology company in Greensburg, on Friday filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.

“We’re not going out of business,” said Mel Pirchesky, who said he was named chief restructuring officer by the board of directors. He said the papers were filed in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Pittsburgh. Pirchesky is CEO of Eagle Ventures Inc., a Pittsburgh-based venture capital firm.

Cardiac Telecom made the move about two weeks after the company’s directors named Joseph S. Anderson as chief executive officer. Anderson, who had been vice president of operations since 1999, replaced Lee Ehrlichman, who had led the company since 1995.

Pirchesky was a financial founder of Cardiac Telecom Corp., after investing $3 million to $5 million in 1990. He said Anderson will remain on board, focusing on growing the business.

Pirchesky did not divulge the company’s liquid assets, or its liabilities.

Cardiac Telecom petitioned bankruptcy court to allow payment of $58,000 owed to workers, covering wages earned from Aug. 13-24. The company said any delay in paying compensation will “severely disrupt” the company’s relationship with employees at a time when their cooperation is critical, according to the bankruptcy petition.

Pirchesky said he’s in the process of arranging “six-figure” financing from undisclosed sources.

“Even with financial uncertainty, the staff has bonded through this challenging period. We will make it through,” Pirchesky said.

Cardiac Telecom was the first in the nation to develop a home-based, real-time cardiac surveillance system that monitors irregular heart rhythms. The company employs 34 workers, including 26 in Greensburg.

“This is a liquidity crisis, which the company will survive,” Pirchesky said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.