ShareThis Page
Memorial Day 2006: War & humankind |

Memorial Day 2006: War & humankind

On Memorial Day, it is insisted that editorialists honor Americans who have died in our nation’s wars.

Why• For surely the dead seek no accolades, no parades and no salutes. They have left this world behind. They certainly know better than we, if they know anything at all, the purpose of their deaths and the consequences for the nation in whose name they perished.

Mourning is about the living. Without the natural process for achieving acceptance of loss, we would surely go mad.

But on Memorial Day — that is for the diminishing portion of Americans who honor our war dead — we dredge up the sorrow year after year.

In some way, we think it incumbent on ourselves to be grateful — even to those who are gone more than two centuries and whose names are lost to history.

History’s chief cruelty, and its chief source of hope, is that it does not end. We add by the month to the toll of those who gave their last measure of devotion and dearly hope that each of them will be the last.

Today we are not so blessed. For Memorial Day reminds us that our only respite from adding to the roll of our honored dead is a tomorrow whose date is not yet written.

So we mourn not exclusively for the brave men and women who have passed through war into eternity but for those who will.

Above all, we grieve for humankind, which has not yet washed its hands of war.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.