ShareThis Page
Men charged with selling fake Stanley Cup tickets outside Consol Energy Center |

Men charged with selling fake Stanley Cup tickets outside Consol Energy Center

| Thursday, June 2, 2016 8:18 p.m
John Green
Ronald Seeley

Two Massachusetts men are accused of selling counterfeit tickets for the Stanley Cup Final outside the Consol Energy Center.

Pittsburgh police on Wednesday arrested John Green, 46, and Ronald Seeley, 45, and charged them with conspiracy, forgery and tampering with evidence.

According to a criminal complaint, police received a tip from ticket vendors that the men were selling fake tickets across from Consol Energy Center.

When officers pulled up to the hockey arena, a vendor flagged them down and pointed to a car that pulled out of a parking lot and took off toward Sixth Avenue.

When police pulled over the car, Seeley tore up eight tickets that were lying on his lap, authorities said. Officers recovered 10 other tickets and $1,384 in cash.

The tickets came back as counterfeit when police scanned them at Consol Energy Center.

A witness told police Seeley and Green offered to sell him six tickets at $200 apiece, but he didn’t buy them because he knew they were fake just by looking at them.

Seeley and Green were arraigned Thursday and remain in the Allegheny County Jail, unable to post $10,000 bail. Their preliminary hearing is scheduled for June 15.

Court records do not list an attorney for them.

Tony Raap is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-320-7827 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.