ShareThis Page
Metcalfe tax plan draws debate |

Metcalfe tax plan draws debate

| Saturday, February 1, 2003 12:00 a.m

The rift between state Rep. Daryl Metcalfe and elected officials in the largest municipality in his district continues to grow.

Metcalfe, a Republican from Cranberry, introduced legislation Tuesday to eliminate property taxes, but Cranberry supervisors question the plan.

“The state budgets are in a bind now. How difficult will it be for municipalities to get their money from the state?” Supervisor John Milius asked. “Don’t leave it to the state to determine how the municipality should be managed.”

Metcalfe’s legislation, if passed, would phase out property taxes over six years. In the first three years, the school district property tax would be removed, and the personal income tax would be increased from 2.8 percent to 4.3 percent while the state sales tax would climb from 6 to 9 percent. According to his plan, in years four through six the municipalities would increase their earned income tax and personal income tax.

Metcalfe’s plan also would allow taxpayers to vote on any tax rate increases.

“People need relief, but this is not the way to get it done,” Cranberry Supervisor Chuck Caputy said.

Milius said he wonders whether the additional sales tax money going to the state once the property tax was removed would filter back to the municipality. If not, he said, the lack of money would be “further eroding our ability to manage the municipality.”

“We have programs we are trying to provide, and our hands are being tied by proposals like this,” Milius said.

Cranberry manager Jerry Andree said any change in the amount of money a municipality gets would have “serious impacts on our ability to provide day-to-day services.”

Dean Berkebile, president of the Seneca Valley School Board, said he had not seen Metcalfe’s latest plan, but earlier proposals to lift the property tax would have made it difficult for the district to operate.

Metcalfe said he is not surprised elected municipal leaders and school board members would be against the removal of property taxes.

“They see property tax as an unlimited pool,” Metcalfe said. “They are concerned they would lose the uncontrolled bureaucracy that they have at school districts and in Cranberry.”

Supervisor Bill Ambrass said he did not think voter referendums work well for local governments.

“He proposes legislation like this every year, and he seems to get farther every year,” Ambrass said.

In a bitter and expensive campaign for the District 12 seat, Metcalfe defeated Connoquenessing Township Democrat Linda Schoettker. During that race, Republican township supervisors Milius and Caputy and Ambrass, the board of supervisors’ lone Democrat, endorsed Schoettker for the seat.

“Directors and supervisors are part of the problem for increasing government costs,” Metcalfe said. “The leaders are opposed to referendums because they want to continue to grow government and grow costs.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.