ShareThis Page
Middlesex secretary faces prison for stealing from township |

Middlesex secretary faces prison for stealing from township

Bill Vidonic
| Thursday, June 28, 2012 4:34 p.m

Authorities may never know what a former Middlesex secretary did with more than $200,000 she stole from the township, her defense lawyer said on Thursday.

“There was no indication of drug or alcohol abuse or gambling,” Charles Porter said of Linda A. Young. “I think she spent a lot of money on her kids and things of that nature. There was nothing that you would classically look at where the money had gone.”

Butler County Judge William R. Shaffer yesterday sentenced Young, 51, to four months in prison. Authorities said she stole more than $200,000 between 2004 and 2011. She pleaded guilty in May to forgery and theft counts.

Young will serve four months in the Butler County Prison, and then another eight months on electronic monitoring. She will be on probation for another 16 years.

According to court documents, Young admitted the thefts when township Manager Scot Fodi and Solicitor Michael Hnath interviewed her in March 2011 after an audit showed multiple checks made out to Young when they should have been made out to township vendors.

“I’m glad it’s finally over,” Young told Hnath, according to court documents. Authorities initially charged Young with nearly 1,200 counts of theft, forgery and tampering with records.

Fodi said the township will recover $55,000 through insurance, and Young also forfeited her pension, valued at $15,400. Young also made a $60,000 payment yesterday to the township. Shaffer set her total restitution at $211,000.

Shaffer said Young, the mother of two adult children, must serve 400 hours of community service, and could end her probation early if she pays off the debt.

However, Porter said of a full repayment, “Realistically, no. She tried to come up with as much up front, but the reality is, often times parties don’t have the means to make the restitution.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.