ShareThis Page
Midweek briefing … |

Midweek briefing …

| Wednesday, October 6, 2004 12:00 a.m

Sen. Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island made a big weekend splash saying he cannot vote for President Bush’s re-election. The Republican often votes liberal — against tax cuts, against missile defense and for Kyoto-like climate control legislation. And this somehow is a loss for the GOP• … Noted liberal constitutional scholar Laurence Tribe finds himself in some deep and hot water. In a seven-page article, The Weekly Standard details how Mr. Tribe lifted portions of his 1985 book, “God Save This Honorable Court” from Henry Abraham’s 1974 book, “Justices & Presidents.” Says Mr. Abraham, “He’s a big mahatma and thinks he can get away with this sort of thing.” More’s the pity. … The Daily Telegraph reports Democrat election advisers have ordered Teresa Heinz Kerry to adopt a lower profile in the closing weeks of the presidential campaign. They fear Mount St. Teresa may be alienating voters, the newspaper reports. Imagine that. … The Justice Department confirms to that its criminal investigation continues into Sandy Berger, Bill Clinton’s national security adviser. Mr. Berger admitted to improperly taking classified terrorism documents from the National Archives. Just in case you forgot.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.