ShareThis Page
Midweek briefing … |

Midweek briefing …

| Wednesday, September 15, 2004 12:00 a.m

The Commission on Presidential Debates is asking for the race of reporters and photographers seeking credentials to cover the Oct. 8 presidential debate in St. Louis. And that has some members of the Fourth Estate rightly up in arms. But we wonder how many of our indignant brethren express the same outrage over applications tied to, say, college admission• … Speaking of race , John Kerry is suggesting that Republicans might try to keep black voters from casting their ballots to help President Bush win re-election. It’s a scurrilous charge from a scurrilous candidate. … The Washington Post notes that Mr. Kerry’s closest adviser, longtime political operative Bob Shrum (a Connellsville native) is 0-7 in the presidential elections with which he’s been involved. It appears that even The Post is preparing to brand Kerry with a big “L” on his forehead. … Camp Kerry must be double-clutching the campaign into high gear. Why else would it, as the Los Angeles Times reports, make a command decision to use the words “new direction” instead of “change”• … One of Dan Rather’s prime “corroborating” sources on those Bush memos dissing the president’s National Guard service now says he never saw the memos. Sounds like a pretty darn solid confirmation to us — of the forgery charge, that is.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.