ShareThis Page
Midweek briefing |

Midweek briefing

| Wednesday, June 29, 2005 12:00 a.m

So, what should Karl Rove apologize for• Recounting, accurately, the historical record of some wacky liberals’ response to the 9/11 attacks• Whitewashing history is not acceptable. … Republican congressional leaders propose using the Social Security surplus to pay for private accounts. It’s an interesting idea — until you realize that the extra money they’re relying on will evaporate in 12 years. Some “solution.” … The Australian newspaper calls prospective Republican presidential candidate Chuck Hagel, the U.S. senator from Nebraska, “a liberal in Republican’s clothing.” Which is exactly what the GOP and conservatism doesn’t need. … Italian and Norwegian newspapers report that Adolf Hitler ordered the development of the world’s first inflatable sex doll in 1941 to “serve the sexual needs of the German fighting man … .” Herr Hitler’s plan for an army of blow-up girls was deflated when Allied forces bombed into oblivion Dresden, where the dolls were to be produced. While Hitler was trying to please his boys (not to mention spare them from disease and keeping the Aryan race “pure”), the Allies put their inflatable skills to better use — deploying fake tanks and aircraft to turn the Germans’ attention away from Normandy. It turned out to be a far more pleasurable experience. We won.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.