ShareThis Page
Minimum GPA policy reinstated |

Minimum GPA policy reinstated

| Friday, October 26, 2001 12:00 a.m

Gateway school directors Wednesday voted narrowly to reinstate a policy requiring a 2.0 minimum grade-point average for students taking part in all extracurricular activities.

The measure, passed 5 to 4, reverses a decision made last month to suspend the policy for a year to allow administrators to evaluate whether it is effective and fairly implemented.

School director Rich Lopiccolo, who proposed going back to the 2.0 grade requirement at the school board’s work session last week, said Wednesday’s decision is a victory for academics.

“We restored academic excellence to the district,” Lopiccolo said. “We are now in full accordance with the goals of our strategic plan, and we’ve put the futures of our children as our top priority.”

Lopiccolo, and directors Tim Varner, Carl Aker Jr., Jim Brown and David Magill voted to repeal the suspension of the 2.0 grade point requirement. Directors Bill Segar, Bob Gale, Robert Kalkstein and Gregg Nemec voted against the measure.

Nemec, who proposed the policy suspension at September’s meeting, said he was disappointed in the board’s decision to repeal it because he believes it was made for the wrong reasons.

“I guess I am more disappointed by board members being affected by mob rule,” Nemec said. “They missed the whole idea (of the suspension).”

The suspension temporarily reduced the minimum grade point average requirements to match the guidelines used by the Pennsylvania Interscholastic Athletic Association, which requires that a student pass four courses – even with all “D” grades – and have no more than one “F” grade.

Nemec proposed the suspension, he said, because the original eligibility policy, introduced in the mid-1990s, failed to address the issue of providing tutoring for students who were falling below the 2.0 standard, as had been discussed by the board.

Opponents to the suspension claimed it “dumbed down” district standards and gave parents and students the impression that athletics were more important than academics.

Nemec said the suspension in no way endorsed a weakening of standards.

The point, he said, was to allow the administration to review the policy and make corrections and changes that would better address the needs of the marginal students in the system.

Repealing the suspension, Nemec said, still fails to address what should be done to assist students who want to compete but who are struggling with their grades.

Lopiccolo said, however, the responsibility of determining what should be done to assist struggling students now lies with the district administration, where he says it should have been in the first place.

“I’ve done my part,” Lopiccolo said. “It’s now time for the administration to (move in) the direction to do what they say they’ve wanted to do.”

Despite his support of the increased academic standard, Lopiccolo admits the implementation of the 2.0 requirement policy has been partially flawed up to this point.

Cheryl Boise, a Monroeville resident and one of several at Wednesday’s meeting who wore “I support the 2.0 GPA” stickers on their shirts, agreed that there have been flaws, but said the solution is to work with the policy to make it more effective, not remove it, even temporarily.

“I am worried that lowering the GPA (requirement) is the first step in covering up the insufficiencies in the district’s plan,” she said.

Bruce Feldman, another Monroeville resident, agreed, saying that the district needs to look into a positive proactive solution to the problem of low GPAs, rather than negating an existing policy.

Segar, president of the school board, said while nearly a quarter of the more than 1,400 students at the high school have less than a “C” average – the equivalent of a 2.0 GPA – that is a problem that needs to be addressed district-wide, not just for student athletes.

“Corrective action is needed ASAP, and it will require a lot more action than developing academically sound athletic eligibility requirements,” he said.

Nemec said he will continue to encourage the administration to provide assistance to struggling students to make sure none who want to compete get left behind.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.