Mold derails lung patient’s dream |

Mold derails lung patient’s dream

Ben Schmitt
Che DuVall, 70, a former glass cutter from Perryopolis with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, underwent a double lung transplant in UPMC Presbyterian.

Che DuVall dreamed of taking his grandchildren fishing on a bass boat and inhaling fresh air without pain.

Afflicted with a progressive lung disorder, he waited three years for a double lung transplant.

On Aug. 1, that dream started to become reality: DuVall, 70, a former glass cutter from Perryopolis with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, underwent a double lung transplant in UPMC Presbyterian.

“Everything was on course for a happy ending,” Jerry Meyers, a Pittsburgh attorney representing DuVall and his wife of 39 years, Karen, said Monday. “The transplant went great.”

What happened next, Meyers said, put the DuVall family at center stage of a mold crisis at UPMC that led to a six-day suspension of its transplant program. DuVall developed a fungal infection on the tissue of his new lungs.

Meyers said the infection spread to the point where doctors on Sept. 4 removed two of five lobes of DuVall’s new lungs. He remains hospitalized.

“The whole purpose of this transplant was to give him new lungs,” Meyers said. “This was a dream — a miracle for him. Now, as a consequence of this fungal infection, he lost two lobes of his new lungs.”

As UPMC officials publicly confirmed this month the deaths of three transplant patients who had skin fungal infections, Karen DuVall retained Meyers and attorney Brendan Lupetin of the law firm Meyers Evans & Associates, Downtown. The firm is considering a lawsuit.

UPMC spokeswoman Allison Hydzik said officials could not comment because of patient privacy laws.

Between the Aug. 1 transplant and Sept. 4 lobe removal surgery, Meyers said, DuVall was in and out of Presby’s cardiothoracic intensive care unit and had procedures in which doctors viewed his lungs with a bronchoscope.

DuVall developed a fever about Aug. 30, and doctors told Karen DuVall on Sept. 3 that he had a fungal lung infection, Meyers said.

Two weeks later, she received a letter from Dr. Carlene Muto, UPMC’s medical director of infection control and hospital epidemiology, telling her that “an infection was discovered that could possibly be associated with exposure to mold.”

Meyers said he’s baffled as to how doctors did not diagnose the infection earlier. Just six days after his transplant, DuVall had improved to the point where doctors told his wife to prepare for his discharge.

Then he started having breathing problems, and doctors treated him with antibiotics for a suspected bacterial infection, according to Lupetin.

DuVall was treated in the same room of Presby’s cardiothoracic ICU where two heart transplant patients who had fungal skin infections were treated before dying, Meyers and Lupetin said.

UPMC doctors have said those deaths, and that of a liver transplant patient at UPMC Montefiore, cannot be directly attributed to the infections because the patients had weakened immune systems.

UPMC halted the transplant program Sept. 21. It reopened Sunday after an on-site investigation by the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Pennsylvania Department of Health.

Dr. Steven Shapiro, the hospital system’s chief medical officer, said UPMC never found a source for the mold. He said investigators may never determine a specific source.

“The most unifying hypothesis is that as we treat one fungal infection from a mold species, like Candida or Aspergillus, and another one appears,” Shapiro said. “And when we treat that, another one appears again. It is a constant battle of man versus microbe.”

He said investigators discounted the demolition of the Children’s Hospital building attached to Presby as an origin for the mold. He said mold found in toilets and a wall of the Presby ICU did not match the type that infected the patients.

The health department asked UPMC to implement corrective action. Shapiro said the plan includes administering antifungal medication to high-risk transplant patients with suppressed immune systems.

Meyers does not buy UPMC’s explanation that fungal infections occur only in sick patients.

“He is a thin guy; he has an ideal body type. That’s the reason they let him undergo transplant at age 70,” the attorney said. “They are trying to make it seem like he is some defective guy, which just isn’t the case.”

Shapiro did not identify DuVall by name but said the lung transplant patient is doing “remarkably well.”

While her husband recovers, Karen DuVall took out a home equity loan to make modifications that would make her husband’s life easier and safer. Among them: a roof replacement to fix a leak, and she feared that mold could make him sick, Lupetin said.

“She is holding up miraculously well,” he said of DuVall, who teaches Sunday school and works as a housing advocate for people with disabilities. “Her positive attitude explains a lot about his improvement despite these incredible setbacks.”

Ben Schmitt is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7991 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.