Monessen coach Pacak notches 50th win |

Monessen coach Pacak notches 50th win

MONESSEN — Anyone who knows Andy Pacak will readily admit he is an extremely likeable guy.

He has a low-key demeanor and a wry sense of humor that, when he allows it to show, tends to elicit hearty laughs from those around him.

But when it comes to his role as football coach of the Monessen Greyhounds, well, it is definitely a love affair with the fans.

Some love him and some love to criticize him.

It’s something he has gotten used to over his seven years coaching the most tradition-rich program in the mid-Mon Valley.

“The thing with that is you kind of mature a little bit as you get older,” said Pacak, whose 9-1 Greyhounds are preparing to meet Springdale in the quarterfinals of the WPIAL Class A playoffs Friday night at Penn-Trafford.

“Monessen fans are very passionate about their teams and I can understand that,” he said. “But you have to realize that we have never done things any different than we always have.

“It’s society that has changed. People are more self-centered and absorbing. Very few people care about the big picture. They only care about what you have done for them lately.”

In last week’s impressive 33-0 shellacking of Chartiers-Houston in a first round playoff contest, not only did the Greyhounds advance, they also hit a milestone.

The team gave Pacak his 50th career win.

In seven season at the helm, Pacak’s record is 50-22, a .694 winning percentage.

Only legendary coach Joe Gladys, who built a 153-64-8 record (.680) from 1959-82, got to 50 wins faster.

Gladys picked up his 50th win his 66th contest, six games quicker than Pacak.

Pacak said Monessen Athletic Director John Sacco informed him before the game that his next win would be his 50th.

“I found out before the game,” he said. “Before that, I had no idea. And I never gave it a thought.”

Pacak said winning 50 games means more to him for his staff and players than it does personally.

“It means a lot of people have done what they were supposed to do and I just stood back and observed,” he said. ‘I’m happy for my staff and the kids, but as a head coach, that stuff doesn’t mean much.”

He added that he doesn’t think he has done anything special.

“I just think I’ve done what legendary coaches like Mr. Gladys and Mr. (Jack) Scarvel would expect coaches at Monessen to do,” he said. “It’s a tradition that they built and we are supposed to carry it on.”

Pacak, whose teams have qualified for the playoffs in six of his seven years, said Friday’s game against Springdale will provide a real barrier for the Greyhounds.

The Dynamos, dating back to 2003, have ended Monessen’s season four times in four tries in the playoffs, including three times with Pacak on the sidelines.

Monessen’s last win over Springdale came way back in 1987 (26-0) when they were rivals in the Eastern Conference.

“The thing about them is that they have developed an offense and perfected it,” Pacak said. “In the tapes we saw, I don’t think they threw one pass and they haven’t had to.

“We need to be disciplined and do our jobs defensively and we will be fine.”

As for the fans who rarely want to give Pacak the benefit of the doubt — win or lose — the coach displayed some of that wry humor he is known for.

“You can say the vultures have been at the door before. Well, maybe I need to make friends with the vultures,” he said, smiling. “Because I don’t think they have ever left.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.