ShareThis Page
Monessen falls in tournament final |

Monessen falls in tournament final

| Wednesday, May 2, 2001 12:00 a.m

MONONGAHELA – Uniontown ran away from Monessen in the second half and then ran away with the championship in the 47th Ringgold Undergraduate Basketball Tournament.

Uniontown captured the title game, 66-44, at the Monongahela Elementary Center. But the final score was a little deceiving.

Monessen at one point held a slim lead and only trailed by three points (28-25) at halftime. However, the depth and strength of the winners was too much in the second half.

‘We hung with them for a while, but they are very good,’ said Monessen coach Joe Salvino. ‘They are quick and play good defense and I don’t think we played as strong as we can.’

Terrence Vaughns scored 10 of his 19 points and Dierre Jenkins had seven of his 14 to lead the second half onslaught for Uniontown.

‘They got up on us by 10 (in the second half) and then they just wore us down,’ said Salvino.

Monessen was led by Matt Dent with a game-high 21 points, 12 in the first half. Brandon Jackson added 12 points.

‘I’m not disappointed,’ said Salvino. ‘We played against some good teams. This was a good tournament and we reached the title game.

‘We have a lot of pride, but we’re a Class A team and Uniontown is one of the best Quad A schools. I can’t be disappointed in my kids.’

In the consolation contest, Ringgold beat Frazier, 60-36. Leading the winners was Jesse Hyatt with 25 points, including five three-pointers.

Frazier was paced by T.J. Martinak with 15 points and Mark Mattras with 13.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.