ShareThis Page
Monessen has youth – and experience |

Monessen has youth – and experience

| Tuesday, August 27, 2002 12:00 a.m

MONESSEN – Most head coaches would look at their roster, see one senior, and be worried. Not Denny Adam-check, Monessen High’s second-year boys’ soccer coach.

“We will be very young,” said Adamcheck. “But at the same time, we return eight starters, so we will be experienced.”

Adamcheck noted the team’s off-season dedication.

“The guys came to conditioning camp in great shape,” said Adamcheck. “Most of them played on spring teams and we can tell the difference.”

Playing at the forward positions will be juniors Joey Dalfonso and Mark Stark.

“We will be counting on Joey and Mark to make things happen,” said Adamcheck. “Joey is really coming into his own and Mark is very aggressive.”

The midfielders will be juniors Jonathan Stark, Travis Ratica and Greg Kabasiak and sophomore Dave Lauteri.

“Our midfielders will be our strength,” said Adamcheck. “They play well as a unit.”

Three of the Greyhounds’ defensive positions are set with juniors Ben Vivio and Lenny Boso and sophomore Steven Gregor.

The fourth defender will be one of three sophomores – Jerry Kifus, Jeff Fers, or Alex Matta. Starting at goalie will be sophomore Matt Stark.

Also seeing playing time for the Greyhounds will be senior Scott Myshin and sophomore Jonathan Lexie.

Myshin will play forward and midfield while Lexie will play where needed.

“The players are really hyped up,” said Adamcheck. “They want to improve on last year’s record.”

The Greyhounds went 6-8 last year, including 4-6 in the section.

“People that watch us this year will see that we know how to play,” said Adamcheck. “Our numbers are up and that helps to make better competition in practice. That makes our team better.

“We might be young, but we should be pretty good.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.