ShareThis Page
Monty Python’s holy grail not dead yet |

Monty Python’s holy grail not dead yet

| Thursday, August 24, 2006 12:00 a.m

The wacky British brain trust known as Monty Python triumphs as never before or since in “Monty Python and the Holy Grail” (1975).

Its engagement anticipates the Pittsburgh premiere of the blockbuster stage musical “Spamalot” at Benedum Center Sept. 12-Oct. 1.

King Arthur (Graham Chapman) gets no respect in “Holy Grail.” He stumbles from castle to castle announcing his name and rank and being told, “You’re not my king. I didn’t vote for you.”

“I told him we already have one,” one castle guard boasts to another.

From the mock Scandinavian subtitles through the battle with the dreaded rabbit, it’s British spoofery with a high-brow irreverence and low-comedy posture.

You can bust a gut laughing along as the troupe debates whether swallows haul coconuts to England.

One of the funniest bits involves a gruesome duel in which the less-gifted combatant, losing limb after limb, goes into “Had enough?” mode. And then there’s the old man who’s about to be dumped into a bin of corpses.

“I’m not quite dead,” he insists in his feeble voice. “I’m getting better. I thought we could go for a walk.”

Joining Chapman are the cheeky lads John Cleese as Lancelot, Michael Palin as Galahad, Eric Idle as Robin, co-director Terry Gilliam as Patsy and co-director Terry Jones as Bedevere.

Additional Information:

Three and a half stars

Co-directors: Terry Gilliam, Terry ones

Stars: Graham Chapman, John Cleese, Michael Palin

MPAA rating: PG. At the time of this film’s release, the MPAA provided no accompanying reasons for its ratings. The film contains comical bloodshed and sexual innuendoes.

Opens Friday: Regent Square Theater

    Movie News

News | World
Politics | Storms
Iraq | Bird Flu
NFL Team-by-Team

    Top Stories

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.