ShareThis Page
Moon brothers sentenced in pot ring |

Moon brothers sentenced in pot ring

A federal judge in Illinois sentenced two brothers from Moon for leading a Pittsburgh-based drug ring that brought about 2,400 kilograms of marijuana from Mexico. The ring included at least 11 other people, including eight from Western Pennsylvania.

Noah Adam Landfried, 26, was sentenced Friday to life in prison and Ross Eugene Landfried III, 28, was sentenced to 20 years in prison, authorities said Tuesday. U.S. District Judge Michael M. Mihm ordered them to forfeit $1 million.

Attorneys for Landfrieds couldn’t be reached for comment.

The Landfrieds set up a ring that hired couriers to transport 200-pound loads of marijuana from Mexico to Pittsburgh along the Interstate 80 corridor between 2002 and 2009, prosecutors say. The organization bought or leased homes along the interstate to help in moving the marijuana, prosecutors say.

Drug Enforcement Administration agents arrested the Landfrieds in the Pittsburgh area in April 2009.

All of the conspirators charged in the case and a related case were convicted, and most were sentenced. They include Philip Stephen Preda, 38, of Aliquippa; Victor James Gaydos, 31, of Aliquippa; Dwayne William Corrigan, 26, of Ambridge; Joshua Wayne Welling, 29, of Ambridge; Ronald J. Marusack, Jr., 25, of Pittsburgh; Richard J. Bedalota Jr., 30, of Aliquippa; Daniel William Keitel, 26, of Bellevue; and Frank J. Berardelli, 52, of Rochester.

The other conspirators were James Edward White II, 36, of Rogers, Ohio; Adam Mitchell Ruppel, 38, of Glendale, Ariz.; and Justin R. Seibert, 27, of Liverpool, Ohio.

The federal investigation into the drug ring started in April 2007, when an Illinois state trooper caught two of the men with 217 pounds of marijuana. According to the affidavit filed in the case, an informant told agents the Landfrieds bought the marijuana from a supplier in Mexico for $600 a pound and sold it for as much as $2,000 a pound.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.