More Adam Lanzas |

More Adam Lanzas

Because I have quite a few educators in my family, I read with interest The Hartford Courant news story “Report lays out red flags, failures in rearing of shooter at Conn. school” on Adam Lanza.

The administration at one of these educator’s schools has taken away early intervention and moved it to a higher grade even though the educators in the school have repeatedly voiced their concerns. The parents of a few of these children refuse to send them for counseling or even to complete the paperwork necessary for emotional support even though they are given numerous opportunities to do so. In most cases, the teachers’ hands are tied and, yes, they are advised to “control superficial symptoms” and appease the students with “profound emotional disabilities” to help them “get through the day.”

Some of these children have “crippling social and emotional disabilities.” If the parents of the rest of the students in these classrooms — the public — knew the true story, they would be very concerned. Believe me, another Adam Lanza is in these classrooms.

Monica Yuhas


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.