ShareThis Page
More Pittsburgh school support workers may strike |

More Pittsburgh school support workers may strike

The Associated Press
| Monday, August 25, 2008 12:00 a.m

Hundreds of custodians, food-service workers, truck drivers and others in the city’s school district have joined clerical workers in threatening to go on strike.

Members of two locals of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees have been working under terms of contracts that expired in December 2006. Negotiations were scheduled to resume Monday. The first day of school for students is Aug. 28.

AFSCME Local 297, which represents custodians, food-service workers, repairmen, truck drivers and other workers, voted Saturday to authorize a strike. Clerical workers in AFSCME Local 2924 had previously voted to authorize a strike.

The votes by the members authorize union leaders to call a strike at any time; the union must give 48 hours’ notice to the schools before a walkout begins.

The district, the second largest in the state, has about 28,000 students in kindergarten through 12th grade.

Richard Caponi, director of AFSCME District Council 84, said he still hopes to get the dispute resolved without a strike.

“We started bargaining in July of 2006. This is August of 2008,” Caponi said. “I think that shows a willingness on our part to negotiate a contract without taking some type of job action.”

School board member Theresa Colaizzi, who leads the district negotiating committee, said she was disappointed by the strike votes but focused on making progress in negotiations.

Caponi said it would be difficult to operate the schools without the work of his members; Colaizzi said the district has a contingency plan.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.