Moss steals spotlight in win |

Moss steals spotlight in win

Add Charleroi coach Dan Haywood’s name to the bandwagon of McGuffey senior goalkeeper Liz Moss.

Moss, a four-year starter and one of the premier goalies in WPIAL’s Class AA, stole the spotlight in the Lady Highlanders’ 1-0 win over the Lady Cougars in a key Class AA Sec. 2 contest Wednesday.

Moss turned back 29 shots en route to her 22nd career shutout.

“She (Moss) put on one of the best performances I’ve ever seen,” raved Haywood. “She was magnificent. We dominated the last 69 minutes, but just couldn’t get the ball past her.”

Jill Workman scored the game’s lone goal at the 11 minute mark for second-place McGuffey (8-1-2, 6-1-2).

“I couldn’t ask for a better game from our defense,” added Haywood,singling out Kim Marsich, Rebecca Stottlemyer, Kim Marsich and Kristen Muncie.

The loss dropped the Lady Cougars (4-4-1, 4-2-1) to fourth place and put Charleroi in a must-win situation for Satyrday’s home game with front-running Chartiers-Houston.

“We’re going to need help to make the playoffs,” added Haywood.

Chartiers-Houston stayed on top with a 2-0 win over Canevin while Vincentian routed Sacred Heart, 8-0, to move into third place.

Yough winner

In Class AAA’s Sec. 6, Yough climbed into a tie for third place with Belle Vernon Area with a 4-1 victory over Connellsville.

Lindsay Proctor and Emily Casara both had two goals for the Lady Cougars (6-4, 5-3) with Christy Boyd and Linsley Fry getting assists.

Salena Morgan was in goal with Megan Sutton standing out defensively.

Yough plays at 4 p.m. today at Geibel.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.