ShareThis Page
Mother hopes to make child’s holiday brighter |

Mother hopes to make child’s holiday brighter

| Sunday, December 22, 2002 12:00 a.m

A single mother in her 20s has hit hard times.

Her only source of income is a meager, monthly child support check from the father of her 3-year-old daughter.

The Vandergrift mom came to the Salvation Army for help.

“The only income she’s got is the child support the father pays,” said Capt. Debra Stedman, of the Kiski Valley Salvation Army. “She makes less than $400 a month.”

The woman signed up for the Salvation Army’s food bank and for Operation Santa Claus, in hopes of making the holidays a little brighter for her daughter.

“She needed the help, and she came and applied,” Stedman said. “This is the first year for her.”

Operation Santa Claus will be met with joy by this woman and all the others who benefit from it, said Mary Ann Domiano, a caseworker at the Kiski Valley Salvation Army.

“A lot of them, that’s how they get their turkey or ham,” she said. “We’ve never had any complaints.”

This year Operation Santa Claus will provide Christmas dinner to 7,415 families and stockings to more than 9,000 children. Recipients are from a four-county area served by 26 Salvation Army units.

Each grocery bag contains the fixings for a complete holiday meal, including a gift certificate valued at $10 for a meat item of the family’s choice. Also on the menu: scalloped potatoes, stuffing, green beans, whole-kernel corn, fruit-flavored gelatin, fruit cocktail, applesauce, blueberry muffins, snack crackers, holiday cookies and hot cocoa. Each stocking contains an assortment of sweets and treats including crayons and activity books suitable for children ages 12 and younger.

is a former freelancer.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.