ShareThis Page
Mourn not for end of pointless blogging |

Mourn not for end of pointless blogging

| Tuesday, November 25, 2008 12:00 a.m

Last week, one of Pittsburgh’s loudest Internet voices was silenced when PittGirl’s Web log known as The Burgh Blog posted its last message.

Though the blog’s readers no doubt are mourning, I cannot count myself among them.

As a paid, professional journalist, I find it troubling to have chosen a profession that’s attracting more imitators than the new Beyonce video.

Writing is a tough gig, and the fact that millions of people choose to do it for free is a mystery to us paid writers. There’s more reward in pretending to be a chiropractor or clergyman, but for some reason, they choose to mock us.

Because no one pays or edits bloggers, this means they compete for attention and do so without parameters, professional standards or editors. Editors scrutinize, adjust and generally have their way with our work, but without them, we’re nothing more than unpaid hobbyists.

Or, bloggers, for lack of a better term.

Several local blogs have shut down in recent months, including mine, which was as inane and self-indulgent as they come. It ceased after even my editors acknowledged they didn’t read it.

Though I never met PittGirl, my work was sometimes featured on her site and those of other bloggers — often with my name attached to one excretory organ or another. This was generally followed by a scathing critique of my writing, conducted by people who never wrote anything more challenging than a signature.

It’s as if our work, however spotty or full of human foibles, plays an even more significant part of the blogger’s life than in our own.

Without our work, the bloggers are forced to actually write something on their own. This explains all that blogging about football scores, favorite cat toys and which episode of “Lost” someone missed last week.

Granted, I’m pleased that people choose to utilize their computers to communicate — rather than, say, plan the destruction of civilization or vote for “Dancing with the Stars” contestants.

But if I had free time to write, not for profit but just to pass the hours, I’d churn out letters to my elected representatives or to bored, lonely people in the military or behind bars. I wouldn’t waste it promoting my private life or imitating hacks like me.

So call me old-fashioned — and I’m sure some local bloggers will call me far worse — but my definition of an article is a work vetted, edited and fact-checked by professionals before it reaches the public. With rare exception does that describe blogs?

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.