ShareThis Page
Mr. Bush’s plan: Words & deeds … |

Mr. Bush’s plan: Words & deeds …

| Sunday, September 18, 2005 12:00 a.m

President Bush did what he had to do Thursday night in New Orleans. He offered soothing words, showed leadership by falling on the homeland defense sword and offered an ambitious plan to help rebuild the Gulf Coast.

And while we might quibble with some of the details, we applaud the president.

The federal government will take the lead in rebuilding hurricane-devastated public infrastructure — roads, bridges, schools and water and sewage systems. And we are heartened by Mr. Bush’s fealty to strict oversight to combat fraud.

Laudable, too, is the president’s commitment to state and local control “in planning for their own future.” Critical, though, is the proviso of better building standards and zoning rules to avoid repeating the insanity exploited by Hurricane Katrina.

But the most important part of the president’s recovery plan will be the most difficult: tackling the region’s deeply entrenched poverty. This nation must finally admit that it is the mind-set of entitlement — the welfare state — that exacerbated Gulf Coast poverty. To that end, Mr. Bush offers a boot-strap approach.

There will be incentives for job-creating business investment in the region, grants for education and job-training and greatly expanded opportunities for home ownership. The hands-up approach always is preferable to handouts. The trick will be to prevent the former from devolving into the latter.

“To mean well is nothing without to do well,” wrote Roman essayist Titus Plautus; intentions are one thing but execution will be everything.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.