ShareThis Page
Mt. Lebanon considers stormwater fee |

Mt. Lebanon considers stormwater fee

| Saturday, November 6, 2010 12:00 a.m

Mt. Lebanon could be one of the first municipalities in Western Pennsylvania to enact a special fee for repairing, maintaining and expanding its aging stormwater system, officials said.

Part of Mt. Lebanon’s $28 million budget introduced this week includes a monthly $5-to-$6 fee that would go into a separate fund for storm sewers. The amount of the fee would be adjusted for each property, based on the area of “impermeable” surfaces such as pavement, sidewalks and roofs that prevent rain from soaking into the ground.

Andy Reese, a vice president with the international consulting firm AMEC plc, said about 1,500 other municipalities around the country have such fees, but none on this side of the state. Philadelphia approved a similar charge that took effect this summer.

Public Works Director Tom Kelley said Mt. Lebanon’s 75-mile system of catch basins and pipes needs work, as illustrated by recent flooding during heavy storms.

“You only see it when you get these hundred-year storms, and we’ve seemed to have had more than our fair share of those recently,” Kelley said. “You can see you just don’t have the resources to address the problem, and you see that the current system is inadequate.”

The municipality doesn’t have a dedicated source of money for stormwater capital projects and usually borrows as needed, said Manager Steve Feller.

“Some years we’ve spent nothing, some years we’ve spent hundreds of thousands of dollars,” Feller said. “We have a long backlog of capital projects that are stormwater-related.”

The fee would spread the cost more evenly by including properties such as churches and schools that are typically exempt from property taxes.

“Among your choices for raising revenue, a stormwater user fee is more equitable than a tax increase,” Reese told commissioners last week. Property owners who make improvements to reduce runoff, such as building green roofs or stormwater retention ponds, would be eligible for credits or refunds, he said.

The commissioners would have to approve the fee as part of the 2011 budget this month, then would consider a separate ordinance establishing the fee and how it would be collected and administered. A public hearing on the proposed budget is 8 p.m. Monday in the municipal building.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.