Mt. Lebanon High School project moves forward |

Mt. Lebanon High School project moves forward

The Mt. Lebanon High School project is back on track after getting preliminary approval Tuesday night from the municipal planning board.

It was the second time the planning board, which reviews development proposals to ensure they meet Mt. Lebanon’s zoning codes and regulations, voted on the controversial $113.3 million renovation project.

The planning board had given its preliminary approval in September, on the condition that the school district win an appeal in Allegheny County Common Pleas Court allowing the school to have fewer parking spaces than the zoning code prescribed.

When the appeal was denied in October, the district had to start seeking approval again — this time addressing the parking problem by entering a shared-parking agreement for 40 spaces in a nearby municipal lot.

“Tonight’s submission should resolve those issues,” school Superintendent Timothy Steinhauer said. “The shared-parking agreement brings the total number of spaces to 542, which is well over the 528 (required spaces) indicated by the municipality.”

The planning board’s preliminary approval is not the final step for the project. It needs to get the planning board’s final recommendation, a public hearing and a vote from the municipal commissioners on whether to accept the planning board’s recommendation. The school district’s architect is finishing the construction plans, Steinhauer said.

Residents opposed to the scale of the high school project questioned whether the school district had addressed all the site’s traffic and safety issues, and whether the shared-parking agreement gives the building as many spaces as it needs.

Attorney Richard Kelly, representing residents who stood against the school board in the zoning appeal, said the school’s stadium alone should require 1,400 parking spaces, as should the rest of the school on the occasions when the gym, classrooms and auditorium are all being used.

“There are too many people in this audience and in this community who have had trouble parking on that property,” resident Bill Lewis said.

The municipal solicitor, however, said the stadium wouldn’t count toward the parking review because it won’t change during the renovations, and the school had done studies to justify needing fewer spaces.

The project will return to the planning board for final approval in December, Steinhauer said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.