ShareThis Page
Mt. Lebanon lawyer to testify against ACORN before Congress |

Mt. Lebanon lawyer to testify against ACORN before Congress

Brad Bumsted
| Thursday, March 19, 2009 12:00 a.m

HARRISBURG — An attorney from Mt. Lebanon is expected to testify before Congress today about an activist group’s controversial role in the presidential election.

Heather Heidelbaugh is scheduled to testify about the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) in an appearance before the House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Civil Liberties.

Heidelbaugh, a partner in a Pittsburgh law firm, represented the state Republican Party in a lawsuit against ACORN, alleging voter fraud in Allegheny, Philadelphia, Delaware and Dauphin counties. ACORN conducted voter registration drives in urban areas.

She will testify as vice president of the Republican National Lawyers Association.

In an advance copy of her testimony, Heidelbaugh calls on Congress to investigate “serious law-breaking” by ACORN and to stop sending taxpayer money to the organization.

“The time is now. The American people are watching,” she is expected to say.

Heidelbaugh will detail the allegations against ACORN by a fired staffer of its sister organization, Project Vote. The allegations range from fostering voter fraud to staging protests at corporations to get them to donate to ACORN.

During the campaign, Republican nominee John McCain charged that his Democratic opponent Barack Obama misled voters about his relationship with ACORN. Obama’s campaign downplayed his ties with the group and said he was not involved in its voter-registration efforts.

In the fall, as the GOP waged its legal battle against ACORN, Heidelbaugh said she received a call from Anita Moncrief, who had worked on Project Vote’s Washington staff. Moncrief, who was fired for placing personal purchases on the organization’s credit card, told Heidelbaugh she had been a source for The New York Times. Heidelbaugh interviewed her at length and decided to put her on the witness stand.

An ACORN spokesman yesterday referred all comment to another ACORN spokesman, who was not available.

During the campaign, ACORN officials attacked Moncrief’s credibility and asserted the group was diligent about quality control in voter-registration efforts.

Kira Gardner-Marshall, who oversees quality control for ACORN in Philadelphia, said in October that the organization fired 220 employees in 2007 and 2008 for voter fraud.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.