ShareThis Page
Mt. Pleasant woman admits lying to police about stalker |

Mt. Pleasant woman admits lying to police about stalker

| Saturday, March 10, 2012 12:00 a.m

Police have dropped charges against a Mt. Pleasant man and filed charges against the woman who they said falsely accused him of stalking her.

Kenneth Jay Brown II, also known as “Joe Dirt,” was cleared of charges of stalking, harassment, public drunkenness and disorderly conduct after he was accused of following Jessica Renae Overly, 22, of 365 Maple St., Apt. 168, as she walked from the Assunta Club at 2:30 a.m. March 4.

Mt. Pleasant Police saw Overly running along Smithfield Street, and she told them she was running from Brown, whom police earlier saw crossing the street behind her. Police arrested Brown.

Later that day, police contacted Overly, who told officers she was drunk and remembered only leaving the club and speaking to police.

After police explained what had happened, Overly told officers she wanted to make her boyfriend jealous, so she started kissing Brown at the bar. The two left and walked toward Brown’s house, she said. She then ran from Brown, she said, adding he had done nothing wrong and that she lied about the stalking.

Overly was charged with false reports, false incrimination and public drunkenness at District Judge Roger Eckels’ office.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.