It saddens us — the YWCA of Westmoreland County, the Central Westmoreland Unity Coalition, Congregation Emanu-El Israel, the Greensburg-Jeannette NAACP, Seton Hill University and Westmoreland County Community College — to acknowledge that after the past 50 years of the civil rights movement, racism still shows no sign of fading away.
The racial slur at First Antioch Baptist (” Racial epithet spray-painted on Greensburg Baptist church ,” Nov. 12 and TribLIVE.com) is an unfortunate reminder that we’re not going to “outgrow” racism anytime soon.
And the same week, there was Eric Heyl’s equally disturbing column ” Fans play race card, spoil day at PSU ” (Nov. 14 and TribLIVE.com) about racially focused harassment suffered by Linda and Bobby Baker, a mixed-race couple, while attending a football game at Penn State University.
As organizations that strive for a culture where differences are celebrated and appreciated, it is humbling to realize that we have so much yet to do. Since publicly admonishing and rebuking people are unlikely to cause racists to change, we often lament these acts of ethnic intimidation among ourselves but struggle to respond effectively.
First and foremost, we must publicly speak out against these despicable acts. Then we must seek to become more culturally competent as we work for a socially just community.
We invite the community to develop active responses to intimidation, both personally and socially. It is the first step to absolute change.
Collectively, we repudiate these vicious and despicable acts of racism.
The writer, executive director of the YWCA of Westmoreland County, submitted this letter on behalf of her organization and the others named in it.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.