ShareThis Page
Multiple podium finishes for Penn Hills track team at WPIAL championships |

Multiple podium finishes for Penn Hills track team at WPIAL championships

Andrew John
| Friday, May 20, 2016 5:15 p.m
Barry Reeger | Tribune-Review
Penn Hills anchor Alex Trower stretches to win the Class AAA 400-meter relay at the WPIAL Track and Field Championships at Baldwin High School on Thursday, May 19, 2016.

The upward climb and magical season continues for the Penn Hills track team as its stays atop the podium in multiple events at the WPIAL Class AAA track and field championships at Baldwin.

The boys 400- and 1,600-meter relay teams were able to continue their progression this season and captured gold medals.

In the 400-meter relay, the team of junior Cameron Jeffries, junior Brennon Hill, junior Cameron Tarrant and sophomore Alex Trower was able to finish with a time of 42.57, which was just in front of runner-up Belle Vernon, which finished with a time of 43.05.

In the 1,600-meter relay, the Indians team comprised of junior Azeiryus Britt, senior Keith Batiste and junior Isaiah Bailey and anchored by Hill, who was able to create separation on the backstretch, was able to finish with a time of 3:22.56, which was just ahead of Seneca Valley, which finished with a time of 3:24.20.

“Going into states, we need to train harder. We know going up there is going to be crazy and it’s going to be closer than this was. It’s good to get a taste of how it will be at states so we feel like we are prepared for it,” Batiste said of the PIAA championship meet Friday and Saturday in Shippensburg.

Hill was able to duplicate the Indians’ performance at the WPIAL Class AAA Central Qualifier at Norwin on May 12 by capturing the win in the 400-meter relay by running a 49.80, which was just ahead of Upper St. Clair’s Keith Leckenby, who finished at 49.99.

“I’m just happy for my team. We trained for this all year and we were talking about this at the beginning of the year on how we wanted to win a WPIAL championship,” said Hill. “We want that gold again at states.”

Even when the Indians finished as a runner-up, they displayed continuing improvement on their time. Bailey finished in second place in the 800-meter at WPIALs, with a time of 1:54.72, which was just shy of Seneca Valley’s Mike Kolor, who won with a time of 1:54.12. A week earlier, Bailey won the Central qualifier with a time of 1:57.53.

On the girls side, freshman Jayla Ellis was able to take home the gold in the 100-meter hurdles, with a time of 14.46, which was just in front of North Hills’ Amberly Valeriano, who ran a 14.93.

Ellis also qualified in the long jump after placing fifth with 18 feet. The girls 1,600-meter relay team was able to qualify for states after placing sixth with a time of 3:58.65.

The other qualifiers for the boys include Trower in the 100-meter (fourth place; 11.15), Batiste in the 110-meter hurdles (third place; 14.94), sophomore Jaden Rouse in the triple jump (fifth place; 43 feet, 3.5 inches) and sophomore Emmanuel Mitchell in the high jump (fourth place; 6 feet, 1 inch).

“It just shows how hard work pays off. They don’t complain at practice. They just do a great job. It’s nice when a team comes together like this. They root each other on. There is not much jealously on this team. It’s the best time I have had in a long, long time,” said head coach Lee Zelkowitz.

Andrew John is a freelance writer.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.