ShareThis Page
Municipality faces revenue shortage |

Municipality faces revenue shortage

| Sunday, October 7, 2001 12:00 a.m

There are a lot of projects missing in Penn Hills’ five-year capital improvements program, and the lack of revenue will mean there is little chance they will be added in the near future, according to officials.

In the package that was approved by council last week, there are basically no long-term plans for street paving, sidewalk replacement and storm sewer repairs.

And because it’s an election year, there has been little discussion of raising revenues by increasing taxes, floating bond issues or other means.

‘This year’s capital program sends one message loud and clear,’ municipal planning director Howard Davidson said of the 2001 capital improvements budget, which totals about $3.4 million. ‘We are currently out of local revenue.’

As a result, most of the projects that remain through the year 2006 and total more than $16.7 million are being funded by state and federal grants. Most notably, they are:

  • The Jefferson Heights bridge improvement, slated to receive $1.3 million

  • The library building fund of more than $1.25 million – $250,000 of that in the form of a private cash donation that arrived last week

  • Assorted park and playground improvements totaling $765,000 in Keystone State grants

  • Improvements to senior citizens’ centers with a $183,000 grant from Allegheny County

  • The projected $7.5 million arriving over the next six years in Community Development Block Grants through the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. This funding must be targeted at low- to moderate-income areas, slum/blight conditions, senior citizens or emergency relief efforts.

    ‘Future councils will have a tough task of finding a source of additional revenue while citizens continue to demand a hold on tax increases,’ said Davidson, who was advocating a bond issue for capital improvements last year.

    Davidson noted that outside of the Community Development Block Grant program, sidewalks have been eliminated from the future capital improvements program. Some of the money that was set aside for sidewalks was transferred to complete the $3 million public works garage, which was dedicated this summer, Davidson noted.

    ‘In times such as this, we often cast aside or delay projects for new parks, sidewalks, and building improvements,’ Davidson said. ‘But in this case, we are also talking about no funding for street paving, storm sewer repairs or sanitary sewers.’

    Mayor William DeSantis said the municipality is trying to get back on track with a street paving program that operates on a 10-year rotation between resurfacing. But as it stands right now, it is sometimes 20 years or more between paving on some Penn Hills streets.

    Members of the Penn Hills planning commission also are concerned about the lack of funding for capital improvements.

    ‘What we’re being told is that we don’t have any money and we can’t do anything,’ said planning commissioner Trent Griffith.

    Looking over the year-by-year projections for capital improvements in Penn Hills, planning commission chairman Al A. Papa Jr. lamented that, ‘as we get out a few years, we start seeing a lot of ‘zeroes” in the individual line item categories.’

    Tom Jewell can be reached at or (412) 380-8516.

    Categories: News
  • TribLIVE commenting policy

    You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

    We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

    While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

    We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

    We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

    We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

    We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

    We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.