ShareThis Page
Murphy criticized for backing campaign |

Murphy criticized for backing campaign

A conservative Christian group criticized Pittsburgh Mayor Tom Murphy on Wednesday for supporting “No Name Calling Week,” an anti-bullying campaign sponsored by a national organization that promotes gay rights in schools.

Murphy proclaimed Jan. 24 through 28 “No Name Calling Week” for Pittsburgh’s schools. The Pittsburgh Public School District did not participate in the program created by the New York City-based Gay, Lesbian, Straight Education Network. A Pittsburgh schools spokeswoman said the district already employs several anti-bullying teaching methods.

The American Family Association of PA, a chapter of the Telupa, Miss.-based group that promotes Christian beliefs, sent a letter to Murphy on Tuesday informing him of the connection to the gay rights group and asked him to conduct more research on such programs before adopting them.

An American Family Association of PA spokeswoman said her group didn’t know if Murphy knew about the program’s connection to the gay rights education network.

A message left with Murphy’s office Wednesday was not returned.

The group’s Web site makes “lesson plans, a video for classroom use and other promotional materials” available to schools that want to participate. According to the Web site, 600 schools participated nationwide last year in the anti-bullying week.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.