ShareThis Page
Murray stuns Nadal in Open semifinals |

Murray stuns Nadal in Open semifinals

The Associated Press
| Monday, September 8, 2008 12:00 p.m

NEW YORK — No one ever seems to run Rafael Nadal ragged, and yet Andy Murray did just that in the U.S. Open semifinals.

Murray finished a stunning, rain-interrupted 6-2, 7-6 (5), 4-6, 6-4 victory Sunday at Flushing Meadows to reach his first Grand Slam final and stop the No. 1-ranked Nadal’s 19-match winning streak at major tournaments.

Trying to become the first British man to win a major tennis championship since Fred Perry at the 1936 U.S. Open, Murray will face four-time defending champion Roger Federer in the final tonight.

“He’s got loads of experience in these situations,” Murray said, “and it’s something new to me.”

The sixth-seeded Murray won the first two sets against Nadal and was down a break at 3-2 in the third in Louis Armstrong Stadium when play was suspended Saturday because of Tropical Storm Hanna. As should surprise no one, the generally indefatigable Nadal made a stand yesterday when they resumed play in Arthur Ashe Stadium, taking the third set and going ahead, 3-1, in the fourth.

“It was almost slipping away,” Murray said.

But he took five of the last six games, breaking Nadal twice and ending the Spaniard’s bid to make his first final at the U.S. Open.

“I wasn’t very fresh,” Nadal said.

Murray never before made it past the quarterfinals at a major and never had defeated Nadal in five previous tries. Nadal, meanwhile, won 54 of his preceding 56 matches and took the titles at the French Open, Wimbledon and Beijing Olympics.

But Murray, the 2004 U.S. Open junior champion, was up to the task this time. He wound up with more than twice as many winners as Nadal, 65-32.

“I had my chances,” Nadal said. “He beat me because he was better than me.”

Murray won a 22-stroke point with a volley winner to get to match point, leaving Nadal bending over behind the baseline, chest heaving. Then Murray completed the service break to end the match, easily chasing down Nadal’s drop shot and smacking a winner.

“I just had to keep my head down and watch the ball — and that was that,” Murray said. “I didn’t feel particularly nervous.”

Murray immediately turned to his private box, closed his eyes and leaned backward. With the crowd cheering, he threw his two wristbands and white baseball cap into the stands.

During an on-court interview afterward, Murray described himself as “very relieved” to have won and to have reached the title match at his “favorite tournament” — which might draw some winces in the land of Wimbledon.

He explained, though, that he was thrilled to have seen his favorite comedic actor, Will Ferrell, in the stands yesterday, and was also excited to have spotted members of the cast of the TV show “Entourage” at the tournament.

“That’s awesome,” the 21-year-old Murray said. “You don’t get that back home.”

Others might be star-struck staring across the net at Federer, who will be attempting to win his 13th Grand Slam title while Murray chases his first.

But get this: Murray owns a 2-1 career mark against Federer.

“He’s probably the greatest player ever, so to get the chance to play against him in a Slam final is an honor,” Murray said. “But I’ve played well against him in the past and hopefully … I’ll do that again tomorrow.”

Nadal was hoping to become only the fourth man in the 40-year Open era to win three consecutive Grand Slam titles, joining Rod Laver, Pete Sampras and Federer. But Nadal has never had as much success on the hard courts of the U.S. Open as on the clay of Roland Garros or the grass of the All England Club.

He beat Federer in the finals at both of those places this year and surpassed him atop the rankings last month.

Saturday and yesterday, though, Murray exhibited precisely the sort of winner-evaporating defense that Nadal usually employs to wear down opponents.

Murray also stood way back to return serves, sometimes 10 feet behind the baseline, in order to better adjust to the heavy spins Nadal uses.

It was the mix of strokes and smarts that have allowed Murray to progress so quickly and guarantee that he’ll reach a career-high ranking of No. 4 after the U.S. Open. One sign of his growth: He had won only two of 14 sets he and Nadal had played as professionals, then matched that total Saturday.

Additional Information:

U.S. Open at a glance

Men’s winner : No. 6 Andy Murray defeated No. 1 Rafael Nadal in the semifinals.

Today’s match : No. 2 Roger Federer vs. No. 6 Murray for the men’s championship.

Today on TV : CBS, 5-8 p.m. (live)

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.