Museums, other nonprofits join forces to survive economy |

Museums, other nonprofits join forces to survive economy

Andrew Masich has been to the altar three times, is looking to make a fourth trip, and that doesn’t count the one time he walked down the aisle with his wife.

Masich, president and CEO of the Heinz History Center, has been involved with mergers with the Meadowcroft Museum in Avella, the George Westinghouse Museum in Wilmerding and the Fort Pitt Museum, Downtown. Now the center is “dating” the Pittsburgh Police Historical Association.

“We’re in the preliminary phase of negotiation with them to determine if the history center is the best partner for them and their mission,” he said. “It seems like a good match to me, but we wouldn’t want to prematurely state that it’s going to happen.”

Many nonprofit experts say the economic downturn and a tight state budget have squeezed many nonprofit groups into considering mergers or partnerships.

“You’ve got a lot of nonprofits looking at mergers,” said Diana Bucco, president of The Forbes Funds. “Driving these are shrinking resources at a time when there are growing needs, so organizations are asking what’s the best way to provide help to those in need with limited resources.”

Since 2005, The Forbes Funds, a branch of The Pittsburgh Foundation, has worked on 32 efforts to restructure nonprofit groups. In the past two years, those requests have grown 44 percent, Bucco said.

Two years ago, helping nonprofit groups explore mergers or other combinations represented just 5 percent of Kate Dewey’s business. Dewey, a consultant specializing in nonprofit groups, said it now takes up nearly 30 percent of her work.

“Much of the financial environment for many organizations has changed significantly,” she said. “Unless they had a reserve fund, these organizations have eaten into any reserves they might have had.”

For example, the Western Pennsylvania chapter of the Multiple Sclerosis Service Society merged last year with UCP/CLASS, a group that serves residents with cerebral palsy or other disabilities.

Before the merger, the society was running up deficits of $80,000 to $90,000 a year on an annual budget of $750,000 and eating into its reserve fund, said Al Condeluci, CEO of UCP.

He said UCP, which has a $30 million budget, saved thousands of dollars in expenses for audits, bookkeeping and liability insurance through the newly merged multiple sclerosis program without adding costs.

Since the Fort Pitt Museum, formerly part of the state, merged with the Heinz Center last year, annual attendance has grown from 12,000 to 19,000 a year, Masich said.

“And that’s growing every year,” he added. “Just this calendar year, we’re seeing a doubling of school groups.”

Increasingly, Bucco said, many nonprofit groups that merge become a program within the larger group.

The MS Society became a division of UCP. In March, Amachi Pittsburgh moved its mentoring program for the children of prisoners to Volunteers of America of Pennsylvania, Southwestern region.

“It’s working swimmingly well,” said Pat Serey, chief development and marketing officer and vice president of the local Volunteers. “The key to that is we really spent approximately a year in dialogue with each other understanding each other’s culture, each other’s mission.”

Another factor making it easier for groups to merge is the ages of their bosses.

“As baby boomers retire, it makes it much easier for groups to consider merging or close alliances because you don’t have to fire somebody or negotiate paying two executives’ salaries,” said Peggy M. Outon, executive director of the Bayer Center for Nonprofit Management.

Not all this nonprofit “dating” leads to the altar, though. Sometimes groups just decide to live together.

Naomi’s Place in East Liberty provides housing for addicted women in their first two years of recovery. The group wants to partner with several employment agencies in the East End to help clients find and keep jobs but doesn’t plan to merge with anybody.

“Our main goal is to build the capacity of Naomi’s Place so we can serve more people in the community,” said executive director Cassandra Williams.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.