Nagy splits on appeals |

Nagy splits on appeals

ROSTRAVER TOWNSHIP – Belle Vernon Area Superintendent Robert Nagy was three for five, and that improved the district’s educational batting average.

Nagy appealed the State Department of Education’s decision to place the five district schools on warning lists – a list for schools not meeting adequate yearly progress standards.

“We did file appeals on all five of our schools,” he said.

Three of the five appeals were granted, removing Belle Vernon Area High School, Marion Elementary School and Rostraver Elementary School from the warning list.

Nagy received correspondence from the Department of Education Sept. 22 that indicated the high school graduation rate was 95.7, which met AYP.

He received a letter Sept. 4 informing him that a data reporting error was to blame for Marion Elementary School’s placement on the list.

It has since been removed.

Rostraver Elementary School also received notification Sept. 4 that it mets AYP, and a department reporting error was to blame for that, as well, Nagy said.

He noted that appeals for Bellmar Middle School and Rostraver Middle School were denied.

However, Nagy noted that both schools – which were warned for attendance rates – were within one percentage point of AYP.

“They clearly had good scores in reading and math,” he said. “It’s not because of scores.”

The Valley Independent Wednesday reported that Rostraver Elementary School appeared on the state’s warning list. That distinction was based on information provided by the state before presstime Wednesday.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.