ShareThis Page
National Weather Service: Low chances of flooding this spring, summer in Western Pa. |

National Weather Service: Low chances of flooding this spring, summer in Western Pa.

Rachel Weaver
| Friday, March 9, 2012 12:00 a.m

A lack of heavy precipitation this winter has resulted in low chances of flooding in Western Pennsylvania this spring and summer, according to the National Weather Service.

During a flood assessment conference this morning with the weather service and the Pittsburgh District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, officials attributed the mild winter to a weak La Nina, a weather pattern characterized by unusually cold ocean temperatures in the eastern equatorial Pacific.

Temperatures in Western Pennsylvania have been above normal for the last three months, whereas last winter, both December and January were below normal.

“We’re starting out above normal and will trend to more normal temperatures and dryer conditions as we move into summer,” said Bill Drzal, meteorologist with the National Weather Service. Drzal said that he doesn’t foresee those conditions leading to a drought.

There has been no significant impact on the region’s waterways from snow packs, Drzal said.

“Last year, most of January and the late part of winter and spring was very wet,” said Drzal. “This winter was very different with warmer temperatures.”

While the outlook is good, Drzal did warn that predicting major weather events can be tricky.

“The biggest risk is in form of individual storms, where the scale of prediction is smaller,” he said.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.