ShareThis Page
Neighbors take a Night Out to fight crime |

Neighbors take a Night Out to fight crime

| Wednesday, August 4, 2004 12:00 p.m

Even before firing up their grill or cutting the cake, folks in Lawrenceville got right down to business Tuesday night.

Members of the roughly 10 block watch groups that blanket the neighborhood gathered for a roundtable discussion. They were eager to compare notes on their last sightings of drug dealers and prostitutes.

They gathered on National Night Out, a yearly event that supports local anti-crime efforts and sends a message that communities are taking a stand against drugs and crime.

Nationwide, about 33 million people were expected to participate in the 21st annual observance of National Night Out, sponsored by the Montgomery County-based National Association of Town Watch.

In Lawrenceville, residents proudly say they are on guard every night.

“We have a lot of eyes and ears in a lot of places,” said Jenny Skrinjar, who lives on Carnegie Street in upper Lawrenceville.

One night two weeks ago when Skrinjar and her 10th Ward block watch members were on patrol, they scared away a pair of men who seemed to be casing the house of an elderly neighbor who lives alone.

The group, equipped with mobile phones and police radios, is on duty from 5 p.m. to 5 a.m. daily.

“We want to call ourselves ‘Nighthawks,'” said Skrinjar, “because we have a lot of nighthawks.”

In some neighborhoods, where crime is less of a problem, the evening was an opportunity for a fun-filled block party.

As soon as Pittsburgh police Officer Michael Blake got out of his cruiser, he had to dodge the spray of a sprinkler that had drenched quite a few toddlers at the observance on Monitor Street in Squirrel Hill.

Fred Whelan, who was grilling hot dogs, said he hasn’t forgotten the true meaning of National Night Out, but “I guess it doesn’t apply to this neighborhood.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.