ShareThis Page
Nesting pair of bald eagles confirmed in Crescent |

Nesting pair of bald eagles confirmed in Crescent

The state Game Commission has confirmed Allegheny County’s first nesting pair of American bald eagles.

Officials are watching a nesting site in Crescent, near Edgeworth. The birds have been spotted near the Sewickley Bridge and on Neville Island.

“It had a white head, a black body and an enormous wingspan compared to other nearby birds,” said Chris Luzier of Ambridge in Beaver County, who saw an eagle about a month ago.

The bald eagles’ precise nest location is under wraps, said Gary Fujak, Game Commission wildlife-conservation officer for western Allegheny County.

“While bald eagles are not an uncommon sight as they hunt for fish in the three rivers area of Pittsburgh, this is the first confirmed nesting pair of bald eagles in Allegheny County,” he said. “In order to protect the nest from disturbances, we are not going to disclose the exact location, and we are working with the landowner to keep the area secure.”

There are 174 known nesting sites in 48 Pennsylvania counties, according to Game Commission statistics.

Since 1983, when only three nest sites were found, officials began restoring nesting sites.

In 2007, the federal government took the American bald eagle off its endangered and threatened species list, but the birds still are protected by law.

“Bald eagles receive federal protection under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, which safeguard the birds and their nests from disturbances and destruction, and such acts carry heavy fines and penalties,” said Game Commission Southwest Region Director Matt Hough.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.