New architecture firm hired for Butler County Community College library project |

New architecture firm hired for Butler County Community College library project

The Butler County Community College Board of Trustees approved a contract with a new architecture firm on Wednesday for the renovation of the John A. Beck Jr. Library. The board was unable to come to a final agreement with the previously pegged architecture firm.

The board voted unanimously to award the contract to Renaissance 3, based in the South Side, for $333,360. Trustee P. Richard RitteImann told the board that the school had not been able to come to an “amicable agreement” on issues concerning a contract with Stantec, a Butler firm.

“It's been sometime now, and it's starting to hurt our schedule,” RitteImann said during the meeting.

A call to Stantec for comment was not immediately returned.

Board Vice Chairman William A. DiCuccio was one of four board members to oppose a decision to pay Stantec for preliminary work on the library. DiCuccio said he believed the board had spent enough in legal fees and time negotiating with Stantec, and the firm did not deserve payment. Stantec invoiced the board for $3,800.

“We attempted to reach a final agreemen but were simply unable. The college is ready and excited to move forward with Renaissance 3,” college President Nicholas Neupauer said.

In other business, the board voted to discontinue the school's paramedic degree and certificate credit program because of lack of enrollment.

Akasha Chamberlain is a freelance writer for Trib Total Media.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.