ShareThis Page
New Castle rallies to knock off Knoch |

New Castle rallies to knock off Knoch

Mark Kaminski
| Friday, October 19, 2001 12:00 a.m

NEW CASTLE: Knoch head coach Mike King said he is more concerned about having a winning season than making the playoffs at this point. But conference game or not, a blown lead never helps matters.

Knoch watched a 28-6 lead evaporate, and dropped to 3-5 overall, as New Castle used a strong running attack and a little luck to complete a 30-28 nonconference comeback victory over the Knights Friday night at Taggart Stadium.

‘We have to take a long look at (games like this),’ King said. ‘Whether we want to play two quarters or four quarters.’

Knoch is still alive in the Greater Allegheny Conference playoff chase with one game left, when the Knights resume league play next week against Pine-Richland.

New Castle (4-4) used a 21-point third quarter, which included a freakish kickoff play. Kicker Joe Harvey’s low-lining kick bounced directly off a Knoch player’s helmet. The Red Hurricane recovered the kick and swiped away the momentum after they had just driven 70 yards on 14 plays. Backup quarterback Russ Relic’s 1-yard touchdown run made it 28-14.

Running back Zach Mariacher helped the Red Hurricane take advantage of the kickoff luck, scoring on an 8-yard run early in the third. Allen Scott’s 4-yard run not long after made it 28-27. Harvey’s extra-point attempt hit off the left upright.

After Knoch went three-and-out, New Castle got the ball, drove to the Knight’s 20, and Harvey redeemed himself by nailing a 37-yard field goal to take the lead for

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.