New Hampshire woman sues Bush, top officials, over 9-11 |

New Hampshire woman sues Bush, top officials, over 9-11

The Associated Press

PHILADELPHIA (AP) — A New Hampshire woman whose husband was aboard one of the planes that crashed into the World Trade Center has sued President Bush and other top officials, alleging that their negligence of airport security resulted in the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

Ellen Mariani’s husband, Louis Neil Mariani, was a passenger in the United Airlines plane that hit the south tower. Her lawyer, Philip Berg, of Lafayette Hill, said the suit was part of Mariani’s campaign to “get to the truth of what happened on Sept. 11.”

“We just don’t believe the federal government has been honest with us,” said Berg, a Democratic activist and former gubernatorial candidate.

The wrongful death lawsuit, filed Sept. 12 in U.S. District Court in Philadelphia, also names Vice President Dick Cheney, Attorney General John Ashcroft and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld.

Mariani, of Derry, N.H., in December 2001 filed the first lawsuit against United Airlines relating to the terrorist attacks, claiming the airline failed to protect passengers from the hijackers.

Though Louis Mariani, 58, a retired sales coordinator for H.P. Hood, died without life insurance and left little money, his wife has decided to forgo the money of the Sept. 11 Victim Compensation Fund set up for victims’ families. The suit seeks unspecified money damages.

Berg said Mariani also has retained him to take over her suit against United Airlines, pending before U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein in Manhattan.

Mariani was referred to him by a local radio talk-show host who was interviewing her, Berg said.

Mariani’s lawsuit also names the Department of Defense, the Central Intelligence Agency, the National Security Agency, the Defense Intelligence Agency and the Council on Foreign Relations.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.