Archive

New Jersey anti-violence event marred by deadly shootings | TribLIVE.com
News

New Jersey anti-violence event marred by deadly shootings

The Associated Press

NEWARK, N.J. — For the second straight year, an annual anti-violence event in New Jersey’s largest city has been marred by deadly shootings.

Two men were killed and a woman seriously wounded in separate shootings that occurred about the same time late Friday in Newark, prosecutors in Essex County said. However, it does not appear that the incidents are connected.

The violence occurred just hours after city officials launched the fifth annual “24 Hours of Peace” celebration. It features several community events aimed at bringing people together and curbing violence in the city.

The first shooting was reported about 10:45 p.m. Police responding to a 911 call found 19-year-old city resident Kevin Baker, who was taken to a hospital but died there a short time later.

The second shooting occurred about 11:50 p.m. Officers responding to reports of shots fired found Robert Harrison Jr., 24, of Irvington and a 27-year-old woman suffering from gunshots.

Harrison was pronounced dead at the scene a short time later. The woman remained hospitalized Saturday in critical condition, and authorities declined to release her name, citing undisclosed security reasons.

Motives for the shootings remain under investigation, and no arrests have been made. Both attacks are being investigated by Newark police and the county’s major crimes task force.

The shootings mark the second straight year that the anti-violence event has been marred by deadly confrontations. Two men were killed in separate shootings during last year’s event.

Newark has recorded 62 homicides this year.


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.