ShareThis Page
New Kensington council considers selling garage to build garage |

New Kensington council considers selling garage to build garage

| Wednesday, October 5, 2011 12:00 a.m

New Kensington officials are researching whether selling the city’s garage could pay for a new garage.

Mayor Tom Guzzo said developers have shown an interest in the nearly 6-acre property at the corner of Stevenson Boulevard and Powers Drive, across Route 366 from Valley High School.

Since the 70-year-old building no longer meets the needs of modern equipment used by the city’s public works department, Guzzo said officials want to determine if selling all or a portion of the property would raise enough money to pay for a new facility.

“I think it’s very clear we need a new garage,” Guzzo said. “The idea of selling that property has floated around for 10 years.”

Council is considering entering an agreement with the Redevelopment Authority of New Kensington to permit the authority to market and possibly sell the property.

City Solicitor James Kopelman said the authority, as the city’s development agency, would be best positioned to market the land, review proposals and assess the land’s value. No proposed use for the land has been disclosed.

Kim McAfoose, the authority’s executive director, said marketing the land would be a joint effort with the city.

On the suggestion of Councilman John Regoli, council on Tuesday postponed acting on the agreement with the authority until a better estimate is developed on the cost of a new garage. Guzzo said the existing property needs a full appraisal.

Guzzo said he hopes council will be able to approve the agreement at its Nov. 1 meeting, allowing the authority to move forward as soon as possible.

Depending on how much land a developer would buy, a new garage could be built on the rear, undeveloped portion of the property behind the city’s salt shed, Guzzo said. Or it could be built on a parking lot or other empty lot elsewhere in New Kensington.

Officials said a more efficient garage is needed, regardless of where it’s built. They noted employees always are moving around equipment because it doesn’t fit properly in the structure.

Kopelman said the existing garage was built about 1940 by the federal government’s Works Progress Administration, which provided jobs as the economy recovered from the Great Depression.

At that time, Stevenson Boulevard was a two-lane road to Memorial Park; Powers Drive didn’t exist, Kopelman said.

Now the building sits along a four-lane highway in a prime commercial zone.

If the land is sold and developed, it would add to the city’s tax base, officials noted.

“It’s a valuable piece of property,” Kopelman said.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.