ShareThis Page
New Kensington man faces trial on rape, assault charges |

New Kensington man faces trial on rape, assault charges

| Wednesday, December 14, 2011 12:00 a.m

ALLEGHENY TOWNSHIP — A New Kensington man will stand trial for allegedly tricking a former girlfriend to take him to an unoccupied Vandergrift house and raping her at knifepoint, a district judge ruled on Tuesday.

At a preliminary hearing, Randy S. Oden, 45, of 1000 block of Francis Boulevard, pleaded not guilty to all charges. A prosecutor dropped one of five charges, but Oden still faces rape, assault and three other charges.

The alleged victim, 27, testified that Oden, who isn’t allowed to drive, phoned her at work late on Nov. 29 to beg her to drive him to a Kittanning hospital because his brother had been in a bad car wreck.

The woman testified she obtained permission to leave about two hours early, got a ride home at about midnight, retrieved her SUV, and then picked up Oden.

Enroute, Oden asked her to do something else.

“He had me convinced to go to his sister’s house in Vandergrift because her car wouldn’t work,” the alleged victim testified. The Valley News Dispatch does not name the alleged victims of sexual assault in most circumstances.

But when they entered Vandergrift, Oden said he had to go to the bathroom right away and asked her to instead pull in at a rental property his father owns.

Instead of waiting outside, Oden insisted that the woman go inside the house at the 700 block of Holland Street, she testified, but she couldn’t remember details.

She said things changed when Oden came out of the bathroom and she asked if he was ready to go.

“He grabbed my arm and said we weren’t going anywhere,” she testified. “He told me that he had lied about his brother.”

The woman said the two screamed at each other before Oden pulled a knife and held it against her throat.

“He said the only way I’d leave was if he killed me and he’d use it to kill himself,” she testified.

She testified that she was pushed down and got up several times before Oden was able to restrain her, pull off her clothes and rape her.

She said Oden demanded that she drive him home but he left after taking her cell phone. She got back home at about 1:30 a.m. and was taken to Allegheny Valley Hospital in Harrison. Police were called.

She testified that she had numerous scratches and bruises, a bruised lip and black eye.

A court-appointed defense attorney asked if the woman had a romantic relationship with Oden, and whether she had driven Oden to the Westmoreland County Court House the morning of the alleged attack.

She affirmed their relationship and acknowledged that she had driven Oden to Greensburg so he could be sentenced to a form of probation for drunken driving.

Defense attorney William Charles Gallishen Sr. also asked if the woman told Oden that she was pregnant with his baby.

Assistant District Attorney Judy Petrush objected that the allegation was neither relevant or appropriate for a preliminary hearing and District Judge Cheryl Peck Yakopec agreed.

Yakopec also dismissed Gallishen’s motion to dismiss charges.

Instead, the judge held to court charges of rape, indecent assault, aggravated and simple assault and terrorist threats against Oden.

Gallishen asked that Oden’s $75,000 percentage bond be reduced.

Yakopec revised the bond to 10 percent of $30,000 and told Oden that if he is released pending trial, he must stay away from the alleged victim, obey the law and not drink or use illegal drugs.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.